3 edition of Does the end justify the means? found in the catalog.
Does the end justify the means?
|Series||CIHM/ICMH Microfiche series -- no. 07679|
|Contributions||Jones, A. E. 1838-1918.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||1 microfiche (13 fr.).|
|Number of Pages||13|
Ovid wrote in his Heroides that Exitus acta probat "The result justifies the deed". What is the meaning of 'the end does not justify it'? However, there is an abysmal contrast between conduct that follows the maxim of an ethic of ultimate ends—that, is in religious terms, "the Christian does rightly and leaves the results with the Lord"—and conduct that follows the maxim of an ethic of responsibility, in which case one has to give an account of the foreseeable results of one's action. First answer not true : "The end does not justify the means" means that what ever effort or what ever reason you had for doing some thing was not was not justified, because the end result was not what you wanted. But what kind of world are we saving if we save it by murdering someone?
Hedonismfor example, teaches that this feeling is pleasure—either one's own, as in egoism the 17th-century English philosopher Thomas Hobbesor everyone's, as in universalistic hedonism, or utilitarianism the 19th-century English philosophers Jeremy BenthamJohn Stuart Milland Henry Sidgwickwith its formula of the "greatest pleasure of the greatest number". Varieties of consequentialism can be differentiated by the beneficiary of the good consequences. On the other hand, if the end is worth the cost, then it is fine to eliminate the undesirables. When we use consequences to make moral decisions, we do not concern ourselves with the choices that get us to the desired result. When we use rules to make moral decisions, we do not take into consideration the potential consequences. Or it can be hard and cruel which calls for a lot of violence.
What is the meaning of 'the end does not justify it'? When a man reaches worthy means with unworthy methods, how does that feel within a human soul? One implication of utilitarianism is that one's intention in performing an act may include all of its foreseen consequences. As a result, it could be argued that there is a moral imperative for an agent to inform himself as much as possible about a situation before judging the appropriate course of action. They justify this by saying what harm can there be in studying the bible. So when federal agents came knocking on his door, he had to make a decision.
Brick floors and brick paving
The fires of autumn.
Citizen participation in social planning and implementation of service programs in the United States
An Introduction to Modeling and Simulation of Particulate Flows (Computational Science and Engineering)
Fair wind to Malabar
Prosecutorial error in summation
Migration (Natures Patterns)
Jacqueline Du Pre
Be Determined Leaders Guide
A plain path-way opened to the simple-hearted
History of dentistry in Pennsylvania, 1868-1968
Lost soldier, lost town
The history of Susanna
Or it can be hard and cruel which calls for a lot of violence. The problem arises in these theories because they tend to separate the achieved ends from the action by which these ends were produced. Teleological ethics[ edit ] Teleological ethics Greek telos, "end"; logos, "science" is an ethical theory that holds that Does the end justify the means?
book ends or consequences of an act determine whether an act is good or evil. It will explore the implications of the statement Does the end justify the means?
book, the rudiments of the social contract, the principles of Machiavelli and solid empirical evidence. Today, Christ is not pleased when men choose to do things their way rather than his way. Because people have a Conscience, whenever they like it or not, people have to feel for others when they do something bad.
It may be necessary to use violence sometimes. A great deal of evil can be done in the name of benevolence. All Rights Reserved.
On the other hand, if the end is worth the cost, then it is fine to eliminate Does the end justify the means? book undesirables. The opposite situation is where a set of morals and principles are agreed upon by everyone. In the first couple scenes it is revealed that the main moral dilemma of the movie will be whether or not the brothers are justified.
However, this need not be the case. Eudaemonists generally reply that the universe is moral and that, in Socrates' words, "No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death," or, in Jesus' words, "But he who endures to the end will be saved.
Is it acceptable to sacrifice your grandchild or any child to save the world? The ultimate reason for justifying sin is fear.
An act can therefore not be wrong if the decision to act was based on a right motive. Some great Indian leaders and thinkers like Gandhi have opposed this doctrine. That is exactly why the ends cannot justify the means—it is a recipe for complete chaos. When churches add days of worship where God commanded not, they transgress the doctrine of Christ.
But all that can be justified if the goal is good. Man has allowed women to become leaders of the church where God commanded them to submit to man 1 Tim It's "the end justifies the means" meaning if you're doing something wrong but for a good reason it's ok.
Like Robin Hood stealing from the rich However, some philosophers argue that we should not limit our ethical consideration to the interests of human beings alone. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne, and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth.
And utilitarian thinking should not be used to rationalize immoral choices. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands.
Practicing and preaching the belief that the ends justify the means would consider to be immoral. The utilitarian qualities of The Prince advocate immoral and unethical processes to achieve honorable or even commendable means and is immoral in it of itself.
Iain King has developed an approach that reconciles the two schools.Jan 21, · Though it may appear otherwise, Manchester Black is not a condemnation of heroes who kill, but rather the justification of those killings.
His mythology represents an overarching principle of the DC Universe: killing comes with a heavy price, and the end does not justify the means. Nov 08, · CMV: "The end justifies the means"; i.e. there is no decent argument against consequentialism Introduction "The end justifies the means" has the reputation of being something said by mustache-twirlers, but in my opinion it is not only true but obviously true.
Aug 28, · Does the end justify the means? David Kilcullen with Julian Burnside (p1) - Duration: Schwartz Media views. Poem - The End Justifies The Means - Duration: Aug pdf, · Does the end justify the means?
David Kilcullen with Julian Burnside (p1) - Duration: Schwartz Media views.
Poem - The End Justifies The Means - Duration: Does The End Justify The Means? First, let’s try to download pdf the sense in which the word “justifies” is used in the familiar statement that “the end justifies the means.” After that we can consider the problem you raise about whether it is all right to employ any means – good or bad – so long as the end is 42comusa.com we say that.In Discourses: I, 9 of The Prince by Ebook political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli, the author notes that “For although ebook act condemns the doer, the end may justify him.” And in the book of essays Ends and Means (an Enquiry Into the Nature of Ideals and Into the Methods Employed for Their Realization) by Aldous Huxley, which was first.